Vote No On Prop 34
Vote No On Prop 34
Essential Services Are at Risk:
Prop 34 threatens funding for healthcare services, reproductive rights, LGBTQIA+ advocacy, and low-income housing.
Nonprofits Are Under Attack:
AHF is just the first target. If Prop 34 passes, other nonprofits could face similar attacks.
Funded By MAGA:
Prop 34 is funded by corporate landlords with ties to MAGA, pushing their agenda at the expense of public health.
The CAA, a front group for corporate landlords, created Prop 34 specifically to kneecap AIDS Healthcare Foundation – in retaliation for its sponsorship of Prop 33, which advocates for rent control. If the CAA cared about patients, it wouldn’t be trying to dismantle the world’s largest AIDS organization, with 2.1 million lives in care.
Consumer Watchdog said about Prop 34, “[It] is a poorly veiled attempt by the California Apartment Association to silence a political adversary. If it is allowed to be put to the voters, no organization in the future will be safe from similar retribution by monied opponents.”
The Solution: Vote No on 34
"Proposition 34 is an abusive use of the state’s initiative system to silence a political opponent. It would set a horrible precedent if it passes and survives legal challenges."
"While voters have mostly seen through self-serving ballot initiatives, the misuse of the ballot continues and recently reached a new high — or rather, new low."
"Voters are mere pawns in an ongoing battle to use the electoral system to further the ambitions of self-interested combatants. For that reason, voters should reject Proposition 34."
"Proposition 34 sets a terrible precedent that could lead to ballot measures becoming one more way to punish political enemies."
"Proposition 34 is cheap political gamesmanship that doesn't belong on the ballot."
"Proposition 34 sets a terrible precedent that could lead to ballot measures becoming one more way to punish political enemies."
"Proposition 34 is cheap political gamesmanship that doesn't belong on the ballot."
"Proposition 34 is an abusive use of the state’s initiative system to silence a political opponent. It would set a horrible precedent if it passes and survives legal challenges."
"Voters are mere pawns in an ongoing battle to use the electoral system to further the ambitions of self-interested combatants. For that reason, voters should reject Proposition 34."
"While voters have mostly seen through self-serving ballot initiatives, the misuse of the ballot continues and recently reached a new high — or rather, new low."