Image

Vote No On Prop 34

Vote No On Prop 34

Stop corporate landlords from silencing nonprofits.
Image
Don’t Be Fooled by 34
Prop 34 is a revenge initiative funded by corporate landlords and billionaires through the California Apartment Association (CAA). They want to strip AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) of its nonprofit status and disrupt its global lifesaving work—all because AHF supports rent control in California.
Prop 34 is a revenge initiative funded by corporate landlords and billionaires through the California Apartment Association (CAA). They want to strip AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) of its nonprofit status and disrupt its global lifesaving work—all because AHF supports rent control in California.
The Real Facts on Prop 34
Image

Essential Services Are at Risk:

Prop 34 threatens funding for healthcare services, reproductive rights, LGBTQIA+ advocacy, and low-income housing.

Image

Nonprofits Are Under Attack:

AHF is just the first target. If Prop 34 passes, other nonprofits could face similar attacks.

Image

Funded By MAGA:

Prop 34 is funded by corporate landlords with ties to MAGA, pushing their agenda at the expense of public health.

Image
Prop 34 was crafted by billionaires to protect corporate interests, not people. 
Image
If Prop 34 passes, it sets the stage for any wealthy entity to silence its opponents.
Image
Prop 34 is funded by the same powerful forces that back the MAGA movement.
Why do Corporate Landlords Care about Healthcare?
They don't.

The CAA, a front group for corporate landlords, created Prop 34 specifically to kneecap AIDS Healthcare Foundation –  in retaliation for its sponsorship of Prop 33, which advocates for rent control. If the CAA cared about patients, it wouldn’t be trying to dismantle the world’s largest AIDS organization, with 2.1 million lives in care.

Consumer Watchdog said about Prop 34, “[It] is a poorly veiled attempt by the California Apartment Association to silence a political adversary. If it is allowed to be put to the voters, no organization in the future will be safe from similar retribution by monied opponents.”

The Hidden Agenda
Corporate special interests have their hands all over this initiative. They do not care about misleading voters and will say anything to silence their opponents. Billionaire corporate landlords claim that AHF is costing taxpayers when the same landlords continue to increase rents, withhold security deposits, and squeeze their tenants dry. They do not care about taxpayers.
AHF uses the 340B drug discount program to provide affordable healthcare across the country, which doesn’t cost taxpayers anything.
AHF uses the 340B drug discount program to provide affordable healthcare across the country, which doesn’t cost taxpayers anything.

The Solution: Vote No on 34

Prop 34 is a billionaire-backed effort to silence AHF over its support for rent control. Voting NO on 34 stops corporate landlords from abusing the ballot initiative process to attack a healthcare nonprofit fighting for patients and tenants.
Organizations Who Oppose Prop 34
Image
"The National Organization for Women is opposed to proposition 34, which is a dangerous initiative that has long-term repercussions for women's reproductive health advocacy."
- Christian Nunes, President, National Organization for Women
"The National Organization for Women is opposed to proposition 34, which is a dangerous initiative that has long-term repercussions for women's reproductive health advocacy."
Image
- Christian Nunes, President, National Organization for Women
News Organizations Opposed to Prop 34

"Proposition 34 is an abusive use of the state’s initiative system to silence a political opponent. It would set a horrible precedent if it passes and survives legal challenges."

~ Marin Independent Journal
~ Los Angeles Times

"Voters are mere pawns in an ongoing battle to use the electoral system to further the ambitions of self-interested combatants. For that reason, voters should reject Proposition 34."

~ The Bakersfield Californian

"Proposition 34 sets a terrible precedent that could lead to ballot measures becoming one more way to punish political enemies."

~ San Diego Union-Tribune

"Proposition 34 is cheap political gamesmanship that doesn't belong on the ballot."

~ San Francisco Chronicle
News Organizations Opposed to Prop 34
Image
"Proposition 34 sets a terrible precedent that could lead to ballot measures becoming one more way to punish political enemies."
~ San Diego Union-Tribune
Image
"Proposition 34 is cheap political gamesmanship that doesn't belong on the ballot."
~ San Francisco Chronicle
Image
"Proposition 34 is an abusive use of the state’s initiative system to silence a political opponent. It would set a horrible precedent if it passes and survives legal challenges."
~ Marin Independent Journal
Image
"Voters are mere pawns in an ongoing battle to use the electoral system to further the ambitions of self-interested combatants. For that reason, voters should reject Proposition 34."
~ The Bakersfield Californian
Image
~ Los Angeles Times